Tom Horn - More on the Grifting False Prophet

And after publishing scare stories about YR4 just last week, NASA updated the odds of a collision to .001% today. 

I won't go into why I lean toward all these "asteroid scares" being scams, but neither Apophis nor YR4 are not going to hit the earth. The "scientists" who ran with the scare have backed off and have distanced themselves from the fearmongering. Unfortunately,  Tom Horn ran with the original scare tactics and supposedly had his vision before the correction. Now that he is passed on, we're left with his book on the subject. 

I don't recall Horn claiming a "prophetic dream" in any of his previous grifts, but in any case, this final grift is built upon the sinking sand of his claim of such a dream in regard to the asteroid in question. We previously looked at Tom Horn's false and ever evolving "prophecies" HERE

After a long career of such false prophecies, I can't believe Gary Stearman fell for Horn's "I had a prophetic dream!" bit. I know a lot of people like Tom Horn, but he has been wrong... a lot. And when you claim your prophecies are from the Lord (although he always pulls up just short of claiming direct revelation) and they don't come to pass... well, we know... you should be dismissed as a false prophet (under the Law he would be stoned to death).

I expect Sid Roth to try and grift off of false prophecies (he's made a career of it), but Horn going on that nonsense garbage of a show speaks as much to his integrity as it does of Roth's. That is, both seem to bow down to the god of mammon over any desire to be true to the Word of God. If it is not yet evident, I have very little patience for people claiming direct revelation from God, thus calling Paul a liar. Revelation for this age ended with Paul. He "filled up" the Word of God. There are many prophecies yet to be fulfilled, but these are already given to man (for Israel, really) in the prophets, through the Lord's earthly ministry, and in the epistles. 

Sid Roth is bad enough, but Horn didn't stop there. He took the grift to Jim Bakker's show.

Tom Horn implies here that "Holy Communion" is the actual blood of Christ. he plays to any audience that will make him a buck and give him screen time.. Spoiler, Tom: Catholic laity rarely, if ever, actually drink the wine. The priest does, but the laity only get the bread. Spoiler 2: neither of the "elements" is the actual body or blood of the Lord. 

Note Horn's modus operandi, he never actually says anything. Always with the question mark. "Could this mean the AC will...?" "Could in be...?" "Are we seeing..?" This is how he gets out of being held responsible for his claims. But in doing so, he is indirectly blaming God for his false prophecies when he is proven wrong.

One of the questions my friend and I use when we see people who seem to be living a rather unproductive life... "how do you eat?"  That is, where are you getting the money to survive? Tom kept writing books that actually said nothing. That's how he eats. They're all speculative to give him an out. He uses Coronavirus as precursor for what Apophis is supposed to bring (thus assuming it is real). 

He was very wrong in his Apollyon 2012 book. Then he just kept moving the goalposts. We covered some of this in our previous post on Horn.

Remember in the Bible when Daniel set up a collection box before anyone could read his prophecies? The "prophet" who sells his prophecies should be shunned and dismissed. More "secrets" from God that Tom was selling for a quick buck. He speaks in the name of God with no sense of fear. 

 NOW, FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER, YOU WILL LEARN IN ZEITGEIST 2025…

• Hidden secrets and forgotten prophecies surrounding the year 2025
• How the current U.S. government is tied to America’s occult destiny
•  Lost prophecies from Qumran forecasting 2025 as the final age of man
•  Why historians and intelligence agencies foresee a totalitarian world government by 2025 •How America’s Capital city is laid out to actuate arrival of Antichrist
•  About the malevolent, Orwellian trinity currently converging
• The means by which the population’s thinking and speaking are being homogenized to create a nation of assimilated devotees who will embrace Antichrist
• The deep, esoteric meanings that names and titles held in ancient societies, the impact they had upon destiny, and what that could mean for America’s near future
• Who the mysterious character Melchizedek of Genesis 14 truly was
• What the “People of the Name” covenant is
• AND MUCH MORE!

I'm still recovering from the Tribulation that started in 2012. These is so much blasphemy in just those bullet points from Horn and his publishers. Again, I expect men like Sid Roth and Jim Bakker to hitch their wagons to Horn's grift, I'm just very disappointed when men like Gary Stearman fall for it. It casts a dark shadow on everything else he seeks to teach. 

The only big "prophetic" names that I think are worse than Horn are Paul Begley and Steve Quayle. These men are blots on the ministry of Paul and on the name of Christ. 

When we understand the biblical principles of "Right Division," we quickly spot these (alleged) charlatans. But as I look around and see professed believers grabbing any verse from anywhere in scripture, fawning over men and women who claim to revelations greater than Paul's, and men and women taking upon themselves titles that God did not grant them, I realize the grift will continue until the epiphenea of the Lord and then his final revelation to Israel.  

Related posts:

• Tom Horn's "Prophecies"
• Christmas is About Israel
• What is Our Hope Today - Part 2

My Right Division Podcast:

• Video Playlist
• Audio Version

Another Look at the Future of Israel - Part 1

I found the following 1918 entry in The Berean Expositor by Charles Welch to be rather interesting:

We believe that one of the results of the taking of Jerusalem from the Turk, will be a great return of the Jews to Palestine.

Rather prescient. But then again, all Mr. Welch was doing was taking Bible prophecy as literal, just as Daniel took Jeremiah literally (Dan 9:2) and knew that Israel's captivity in Babylon would be limited to 70 years (Jer 29:10). Mr. Welch was not alone in his expectation. Over the history of the true church, there has always been some expectation of Israel's regathering. This expectation gained prominence in the 19th century and the early 20th century because of men like Darby, Kelly, Gaebelein, Bullinger, Anderson and other dispensationalists.

No people, in the history of the world, have been removed from their land, scattered to all corners of the globe, maintained their identity, and returned two thousand years later to reform their nation as the Jewish people have.

As we look at the great wars facing Israel (outlined in Psalm 83 and Ezekiel 38 & 39 as well elsewhere among the prophets), we see that the nations noted and the conditions of that future day are lining up with what we see in our day. The great regathering of Israel, assumed by Mr, Welch and others many years before it would happen, has blossomed before our eyes (and Jews continue to flock to Israel daily). We may very well see the expected wars break out before our eyes as well.


As Daniel read the signs of the times and as the Lord Jesus called on those in his days to read the signs of the times, let us carefully consider the world around us in light of scripture as they sit today at this writing.


Israel Is Not in the Land in Faith

Although I support Israel, and believe that Christians should do the same, we cannot deny Israel's continued rejection of God as a nation. Surely Israel is in the land in unbelief. In general, it is a very carnal nation with little concern for God. But within her is a remnant that God will use in the age to come to evangelize the world (in the name of her Messiah, the Lord Jesus Christ, the only name by which any are rescued). Acts 4:12

Two women are contrasted in the Revelation. One a Bride, the other a Harlot. The figure of an unfaithful wife is constantly used in the O.T. to describe Israel in apostacy.

Mr. Welch (quoted above) sees believing (overcoming) Israel as the Bride contrasted with harlot Israel as the Scarlet Woman. Not all Israel is Israel (Rom 9:6). In the near future, all true Israel will be rescued (delivered) when Christ finally turns all ungodliness away from Israel (Rom 11:26-27; Is 59:20-21) and destroys her enemies.

As the Revelation is the future of story of Israel, his words should be considered soberly. Believing Israel is destined for a great future, yet there are some terrible times ahead before she realizes those promises.


Israel's Future is Not the Future of The Body

In Part 2, we will look at Israel's deliverance and how Christians who supposedly reject Replacement Theology (the idea that "the church" has replaced Israel in God's plan) blindly teach that the current church has replaced Israel in the New Covenant! As we have noted in other studies, the New Covenant is for Israel and is not what we are under in the current age (Jeremiah 31, Hebrews 8, etc.).

I referenced Romans 11 in the last section. To whet our appetite, I will quote it here and ask the reader to note the future nature of the promise and the subject of the promise:

The Deliverer will come out of Zion, And He will turn away ungodliness from Jacob; For this is My covenant with them, When I take away their sins.

The Lord WILL (future) take away ungodliness from JACOB (Israel, not the Body of Christ). Why? Because the New covenant (like the old, again read: Jeremiah 31, Hebrews 8) is with THEM. He will, at that time, take away THEIR sins. Paul is quoting from the prophecy of Isaiah which continues:

“As for Me,” says the Lord, “this is My covenant with them: My Spirit who is upon you, and My words which I have put in your mouth, shall not depart from your mouth, nor from the mouth of your descendants, nor from the mouth of your descendants’ descendants,” says the Lord, “from this time and forevermore.”

Isaiah 59 is clearly a prophecy for Israel. Paul's use of it, long after the cross, tells us that it has not yet been fulfilled. The pronouns refer to ISRAEL, back in the land, in a future age. We will see in Jeremiah and Hebrews how the New Covenant is for a future, fully restored, believing israel and not for the The Body of Christ.



Just as the Old Covenant was never given to me, neither is the new.

Things to Consider:

• Israel is back in the land as prophesied (although in unbelief)
• Israel is separate from The Body
• Israel is yet to play a key role in the plan of God
• The New Covenant is not yet in effect
• The New Covenant is not for The Body, it is for a redeemed Israel

Checking on the False Prophets (Tom Horn's Prophecies)

The late Tom Horn was another "prophet" who kept moving his goalposts. Now, I'm not opposed to some speculation on a biblical timeline for the events of the Revelation (I've written a couple of posts on it here myself). But there are some men who have made a small fortune on their prophetic takes. We've discussed my thoughts on, in my opinion, the charlatan Jonathan Cahn, but here we turn back to Tom Horn. The man who hawked his books anywhere he could, even along side the professed Christian's charlatan's greatest friend, The Sid Roth Show. 

In his book Apollyon Rising :2012, Tom speculated using the Mayan calendar. 

This could mean the end of the Mayan calendar—December 21, 2012—is the very day the two witnesses are killed by Apollo, as this Mayan ending-date is three and one-half days before Christmas. This would also indicate that the middle of the Great Tribulation period is December 21, 2012.

On the other hand, people who believe in a pretribulation Rapture would point out that the “catching away” of the saints did not happen in 2009, and therefore the Masonic date 2016 might better represent the “midst of the week” (see Daniel 9:27; Revelation 11–13) when Apollo (Antichrist) presents himself as God and sets up the “abomination” in the temple in Jerusalem. Under this scenario, the year 2012 would represent the beginning of the Great Tribulation period, three and one-half years before mid-2016.

That the year 2012 marks the beginning of the Great Tribulation not only could fit with Bible prophecy, as it is in the “midst of the week”—three and one-half years into the Great Tribulation period—when Antichrist enthrones himself as God in the temple, this would also conform well with the Masonic and Great Seal prophecies forecasting the return of the Great Architect and Hiram Abiff (Apollo/Osiris/Nimrod), who enters the finished temple as god, in this case, mid2016, which is three and one-half years following 2012.

In what could also be a related fact, June 21, 2016, is exactly three and one-half years after the Mayan ending-date of December 21, 2012, and June 21 marks the summer solstice in the Northern Hemisphere and the winter solstice in the Southern Hemisphere when a cusp line is created between Gemini and Cancer, signs that David Ovason referred to as having deep astrological significance to the founding and secret destiny of America.

It is also very important to recognize that, based on Daniel chapter 9 and related texts, scholars believe a period of not more than seventy years (a biblical generation) will elapse between the reformation of Israel as a nation and the return of Jesus Christ. When seventy years is added to 1948—the year Israel was formally recognized as an independent nation by the United Nations—it brings us through the year 2018. Does this mean that the year 2019—exactly seven years after 2012—would mark the year that Jesus Christ returns with the armies of heaven to establish His rule over earth?

Learn more at www.ApollyonRising2012 .com

-Excerpt - "Apollyon Rising 2012" by Tom Horn

Warning: the website seems to now be malware now

OK. That book, at least, regularly claims it's all speculation. But in The Wormwood Prophecy [2019] he claims to have been given a vison from God of the destructive asteroid hitting the earth. That is a far more serious issue. His vision would place the "rapture" (for those who hold to that) in 2025. This is that timeline:

Tom has Wormwood catastrophically hitting the earth around March 2029 (via a vision, remember). In any case he has the Tribulation starting October of 2025, and the "rapture" some time before that.

From Horn's book, The Messenger:

Assuming for the moment that I am right, and that the asteroid Apophis is biblical Wormwood and therefore 2029 represents a time around the middle of the Great Tribulation period when the trumpet judgments begin, Monday**, October 13, 2025 (April 13, 2029, minus three and a half years), would be the approximate start date of the seven years of Tribulation foreseen in Scripture** (see Matthew 24:21; Revelation 7:14; and Daniel 12:1).

Just as Sid Roth been exposed as a charlatan, and popular false prophet, Paul Begley, claimed his demonstrably false prophecies were given to him by God, so we must conclude that Tom Horn was a charlatan at best and a false prophet at worst.

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears. And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

-2 Tim 2:2-4 

 

Now, I am one who believes we are approaching the culmination of the current age, but I claim no vison and I would not try to derive spiritual truth from things like the Mayan Calendar or the caves of Qumran. I have laid out possible (stressing the word "possible") scenarios for events remaining to be fulfilled, but as a member of The Body, and not a son of Abraham, the full revelation of those events will be for a restored, believing Israel some day.

My revelation ended with Paul's final revelation.

I am a minister, according to the dispensation of God, which is given me unto you, to fulfill the word of God

-Colossians 1:25

I realize this is a paraphrase, but The Living Bible sums up Paul's ministry well. While it does complete the thought regarding Paul "filling up" and "completion" of God's full revelation, it does summarize well Paul's calling in the Mystery for this Gentile age.

God has sent me to help his Church and to tell his secret plan to you Gentiles.

Does the Lord Command Sinless Perfection ("Go and Sin No More')?

Afterward Jesus found him in the temple, and said to him, “See, you have become whole. Sin no more lest something worse happens to you.”

-John 5:14

 

When Jesus had stood up and saw no one but the woman, He said to her, “Woman, where are your accusers? Did no one condemn you?” She said, “No one, Lord.” Jesus said to her, “Neither do I condemn you. Go and sin no more.” Again, Jesus spoke to them, saying, “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows Me shall not walk in the darkness, but shall have the light of life.”

-John 8:10-12 

Most believers are familiar with the account in the life of our Lord when he tells the woman caught in adultery to "go and sin no more." We also have quoted a similar instruction in John 5 where the Lord heals the man at the pool of Bethesda who had been sick for 38 years. He says to the man, "Take up your bed and walk.” It is not at that time that the Lord instructs to "sin no more," but only when the Lord Jesus sees him in the temple after.

A few things we need to note before we try to put some greater contexts to these instructions. First, we only find these statements in the Book of John. This is an account of the Lord's ministry to Israel (both people addressed are Jews) in his deity (the focus of John's Gospel, John 1:1). Secondly, we note that the Lord does not give this admonition to everyone he heals or to everyone whose sins he forgives.

In this same book, in chapter 4, the Lord meets with a Samaritan woman (remember that his disciples, Apostles to the Circumcision were forbidden to preach the Gospel of the Kingdom in Samaria, Matthew 10:5-6). The Lord reminds her that "salvation is of the Jews" (John 4:22) after he has confronted her with her sin.

Jesus said to her, “Go, call your husband, and come here.” The woman answered, “I have no husband.” Jesus said to her, “You are right in saying, ‘I have no husband,’ for you have had five husbands, and he whom you now have is not your husband. So you have spoken truthfully.”

-John 4:16-18

The woman became a strong witness for the Christ of Israel. 

Many of the Samaritans of that city believed in Him because of the word of the woman who testified, “He told me all that I ever did.” So when the Samaritans came to Him, they asked Him to remain with them. And He stayed there two days. And many more believed because of His word. They said to the woman, “Now we believe, not because of what you said, for we have heard for ourselves and know that this Man is indeed the Christ, the Savior of the world.”

-John 4:39-42

They recognized Jesus a both "Christ" and "Savior of the World," not just the Savior of Israel. As we have seen in our look at the Canaanite gentile woman in Matthew 15 who is told by the Lord that he was "sent to none except to the lost sheep of the House of Israel" (Matthew 5:24), the Lord Jesus, while Lord of all, is not the Son of David to all men, but only to Israel.

So, while the Lord Jesus is both Christ and Lord of all people, his ministry as an earthly king and as the Son of David is unique to the earthly calling for the nation of Israel. 

With that in mind, we note that he does not tell the woman in Samaria to "go and sin no more," nor does he warn her some calamity would befall her if she returned to her sin (as he did with the man at the pool of Bethesda). Is the Lord thus giving her sanction to sin? God forbid. The Lord is never the author of sin nor can a thrice Holy God condone sin. She will, as we all will, answer for her life in faith.

But there is a juxtaposition here. She is not instructed as the woman caught in adultery in John 8 nor are others whom the Lord heals in the other gospel accounts.

Certainly, the two gentiles the Lord heals in Matthew 10 and Matthew 15 are given no such instruction. In fact, he neither sees nor touches either of them. They are healed on the basis of the faith of gentiles from a distance. We note that in the gospel of the King and Kingdom in Matthew, gentiles are treated differently and separately from Jews, but the Lord is still Lord of the Gentiles.

In chapter 9 of Matthew, we see the blind men healed along with the mute man. And after these accounts we are told by inspiration:

Jesus went throughout all the cities and villages, teaching in their synagogues, preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing every sickness and every disease among the people [Israel]. But when He saw the crowds, He was moved with compassion for them, because they fainted and were scattered, like sheep without a shepherd.

-Matthew 9:35-36

As the Christ King sent to Israel, the Lord Jesus serves Israel as a Shepherd guards, tends, protects, and feeds his sheep. Whereas sin is always a problem in man, we do not see the Holy One of Israel preaching that they "go and sin no more" in Matthew. 

If I have not been clear, I say again, sin is never commended by the Lord and the Lord has always called men to turn from sin unto Himself. But we must recognize the different aspects of the Lord's ministry. In John, we see God reaching out to his people, his nation. He did not come to condemn them, but to free them.

“If anyone hears My words and does not believe, I do not judge him. For I did not come to judge the world, but to save the world. He who rejects Me, and does not receive My words, has that which judges him. The word I have spoken will judge him on the last day.

-John 12:47-48

I believe it is in John that the Lord expresses clearly to Israel that when he finally cleanses the Virgin of Israel, his call is for the nation to "sin no more," that is, "to rebel no more," "to worship false idols no more," to "reject Christ no more." 

But we must deal with the specifics in John. These people the Lord heals and forgives are expressly told to sin no more (the former being warned that something worse than his healed sickness would come upon him). I think there is a practical side to the Lord's warning.

In the case of the adulteress woman in John 8, I take the admonition to "sin no more" to mean the specific sin for which the woman was being accused. There cannot be an expectation of sinless perfection in the flesh. We have seen the level of carnality and wickedness in the Corinthian assembly. There was such wicked sin there that it was not even named among the unbelieving gentiles ("pagans" NIV, 1 Cor 5:1). Chapter 6 is a listing of the wicked carnality among believers there. 

I'm careful with the epistles written by the Apostles to the Circumcision, but there is general truth here. I believe the idea of sinning no more, for the individual, is rooted in returning to sin  from which we have been freed and forgiven or habitually sinning.

My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous: and he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world. 

-1 John 2:1-2

Essentially, 

"I'm writing to you so that you not habitually sin any longer. However, when you do sin, do not forget we have a mediator between us and the holy God, Jesus Christ who is fully pure and righteous. He is the the one who has fully paid for all sin, and that payment is so complete, it not only covers the sins of his own children, but all sins of all men." 

-1 John 2:1-2  (Michael's translation)

But we never lose sight of the picture and warnings for Israel in connection to the earthly plan. The Apostle to the Circumcision writes of false teachers in his epistle to the Dispersion as they awaited the return of the Lord and the restoration of the Kingdom in Israel. Israel had false prophets. He warns faithful and believing Jews not to follow these men back to the mud.

These men [false teachers, 2 Peter 2:1] are wells without water and clouds that are carried by a storm, for whom the gloom of darkness has been reserved forever. For when they speak arrogant words of vanity, they entice by the lusts of the flesh and by depravity those who barely escaped from those who live in error. Although they promise them freedom, they themselves are slaves of corruption, for by that which a man is overcome, to this he is enslaved. For if after they have escaped the defilements of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, and they are again entangled in them and are overcome, the latter end is worse for them than the beginning. For it would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness than to have known it and then turn back from the holy commandment that was delivered to them. But it has happened to them according to the true proverb, “The dog returns to his own vomit,” and “the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mud.”

-2 Peter 2:17-22

The Lord's ministry in John is generally in Jerusalem and centered around the temple. The healing of the man in John 5 is in the area in and around the temple (John 5:1, 14). The adulteress woman in John 8 is brought to the Lord in the temple (John 8:2). At the end of chapter 8, we are told that the Lord "went out of the temple" (John 8:58). Chapter 9 begins with the healing of the blind man. The blind man was told by the Lord to go to the Pool of Siloam which is just outside the temple, but still on Mount Moriah.

He answered, “A Man called Jesus made clay, anointed my eyes, and said to me, ‘Go to the pool of Siloam and wash.’ So I went away and washed, and I received my sight.”

This man is not given any instruction to go and sin no more. He is a picture of a blind Israel that is given sight by the their Messiah. When the Pharisees confront the Lord, he uses the man and the healing of his blindness as a picture of the difference between believing and unbelieving Israel.

Jesus heard that they had thrown him out, and when He found him, He said, “Do you believe in the Son of God?” He answered, “Who is He, Lord, that I may believe in Him?” Jesus said to him, “You have seen Him, and it is He who speaks with you.” Then he said, “Lord, I believe.” And he worshipped Him. Jesus said, “I came into this world for judgment, that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may become blind.” Some Pharisees who were with Him heard these words, and said to Him, “Are we also blind?” Jesus said, “If you were blind, you would have no sin. But now you say, ‘We see.’ Therefore your sin remains.

-John 9:35-41

And before we leave this scene, we should not miss the testimony of the healed blind man that no such thing had been seen "since the ages began" ("from the age" YLT).

from the age it was not heard, that any one did open eyes of one who hath been born blind

-John 9:32 (Young's Literal Translation)

The Lord has never promised anyone complete healing in any past age or in the present age. The parallel here is that the healings in the gospel age and the Acts age were mere pictures of an age to come in the Kingdom and beyond. In a similar way, the sinless perfection we will finally experience will be realized in resurrection. 

Surely, there are consequences to sin in this age, and if the Lord frees us from a sin or an ailment connected to sin, it is best if we "go and sin no more."  Some will ignore that warning and find the latter stare worse than the former. 

So, it is not a requirement for the gift of resurrection life that we must struggle to "sin no more" (an impossibility in these current bodies) to somehow "maintain" what Christ accomplished on our behalf. Such an idea is not only unbiblical, it is a denial of the sufficiency of Christ. What we must do is take all of the warnings in scripture concerning the negative consequences of sin (in this life and in the judgment of service) and seek to feed the new nature. 

All sickness is the result of the Fall, but not all sickness is the result of personal sin. All healing is from the Lord, but not all healing is the same in every age. We should seek to "sin no more" by seeking to walk in the holy spirit (the new nature) and by remembering what the Lord has accomplished on our behalf. In the end, obedience as an act of the will is both and act of love towards God and an acknowledgement of the damage that sin has done since the ages began. 

God is Never Without a Witness (The Witness to Gentile and Jew)

 We must walk very carefully when we speak of the gift of resurrection life ("Life through His Name," John 20:31). We are careful to say that the greatest hope for any person, and the greatest rewards, crowns, prizes are only possible for those who has placed full faith in the death, burial, lack of decay, and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ (alone) on our behalf.

For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect. For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God. For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent. Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe. For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumbling-block, and unto the Greeks foolishness.

-1 Cor 1:17-23 (KJV)

This passage contains the English translation of a Greek quotation from the prophet Isaiah (written in Hebrew) 29:14b. Isaiah's word from the Lord was directly specifically to Israel expanded.

Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men: Therefore, behold, I will proceed to do a marvelous work among this people, even a marvelous work and a wonder: for the wisdom of their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hid.

-Isaiah 29:2        3-24 (KJV)

Below you will see an English rendering of verse 14b from the Septuagint (Greek version of the Hebrew scriptures). I believe "hide" is a better rendering than "bring to nothing" as it is rendered in the KJV English in 1 Corinthians.  The KJV translators correctly understood this when they translated Isaiah 29, but oddly missed in when translating 1 Corinthians 1. It’s not a horrible error (and possibly defensible in one way or another), but we’re better of understanding the idea as “hid” or “hide.” The Hebrew word is çâthar which really has the idea of hiding. This can be even more clearly seen to the English eye in the Greek rendering krýptō from the Septuagint.

I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will hide the understanding of the prudent.

-Isaiah 29:14b (Septuagint) 

Another example for us to consider from the 14 times Isaiah uses the Hebrew word çâthar in is Isaiah 8:17, KJV).

"And I will wait for Jehovah, that hideth his face from the house of Jacob, and I will look for him." 

But whether God is hiding or bringing to nothing someone's understanding, the question which cannot be lost is "who?" And the answer, as we have alluded to, is clearly Israel ("this people"). As we have seen many times in previous studies, the epistles to the Corinthians were written by Paul in the Acts age and the apostle is there still making references to Jewish believers as being distinct from Gentile believers in that age (a distinction we no longer make in the current age). 

We will not spend a lot of this study on this distinction as it is covered elsewhere, but we will divert for a few moments just to set the context for this study. We will point to a couple of verses in First Corinthians to that end. When we fail to rightly divide (or draw the lines) in 1 Corinthians, we will not see the truth God is trying to relate nor will we see God’s plan in view.

While God had created a single body of believers in Corinth (1 Cor 12:13), he continued to make a distinction within that body as we've seen in our look at Acts 15, Acts 21, Romans 9, Romans 11, and elsewhere in the Acts Age epistles. Paul points Jewish believers to their (and his) fathers and the nation; he points Gentile believers to their former practice of idol worship.

Moreover, brethren, I do not want you to be unaware that all our fathers were under the cloud, all passed through the sea... Look at Israel according to the flesh. Are not those who eat the sacrifices involved with the altar?

-1 Cor 10:1, 18

 

Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I do not want you to be ignorant: You know that you were Gentiles, carried away to these dumb idols, however you were led.

-1 Cor 12:1-2 

Paul refers to both Jewish and Gentile believers as "brethren" (adelphós). But outside the faith, he and the other apostles will only refer to Jews as their brethren" (adelphós). Peter refers to unbelieving Jews as "Ye Men (anḗr) of Israel" in Acts 3:12 as his "brethren" in Acts 3:17 (adelphós).  Stephen refers to unbelieving Jews as "Brethren" in Acts 7. Paul before the unbelieving chief priests and council in Acts 23 refers to these Jews as "brethren." Even to the very end of the Acts, chapter 28, Paul is calling unbelieving Jews in Rome his "brethren." 

In Acts 14, Paul addresses Gentiles as "anḗr" or "sirs" only. When Paul again uses the witness of creation in Acts 17 in Athens, he addresses his Gentile listeners as "Ye men of Athens," again using "anḗr," but not then using adelphós as Peter does in Acts 3. 

None of that is conclusive, but it is a pattern that should be noted in light of other clearly stated truths concerning the Lord's ministry to Israel and the calling of the Apostles in the Acts Age.

The Lord in John 4:22 clarifies this thought concerning those outside Israel. He speaks these words to a Samaritan to whom he is offering "living water" (v.10). We recall that the disciples were forbidden to preach the Gospel of the Kingdom in Samaria ("These twelve Jesus sent out, charging them, 'Go nowhere among the Gentiles, and enter no town of the Samaritans, but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel'." -Matt 10:5-6). 

[The Lord Jesus said] You [Samaritans] worship what you do not know; we [Jews] worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews.

-John 4:22 

A similar distinction is made to the Canaanite woman in Matthew 15.

 

He answered, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel..." And he answered, "It is not fair to take the children's bread and throw it to the dogs."

-Matthew 15:24,26 

 

When the woman takes her place as merely a dog at the master's table, and stops using his Kingdom title, Son of David, he recognizes her faith.

She said, "Yes, Lord [drops "Son of David"], yet even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters' table." Then Jesus answered her, "O woman, great is your faith! Be it done for you as you desire." And her daughter was healed instantly.

-Matthew 15:27-28

Familiar territory for those familiar with this writer's ministry. However, in light of the traditions of men, we must revisit it often to set the context of the Lord's earthly ministry and the Lord's Kingdom calling and plan during the Acts Age (cp. Acts 1:6; 3:19-21; 15:15-16; etc.). The Lord uses plain and clear language concerning his calling and the mission of the twelve. 

As the Lord worked his plan for the earth through Israel (the descendants of Abraham), he had not forgotten the Gentile. When Paul speaks to Jews in  the synagogues, he points to the Law and the prophets as his witness. When Paul speaks to he Gentiles, his witness is Creation. Gentiles never had the Law.

We also are men, of like nature with you, preaching to you to turn from these vain things to the living God, who made the heaven and the earth and the sea, and everything that is in them, who in times past allowed all nations to walk in their own ways. Yet He did not leave Himself without witness, for He did good and gave us rain from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying our hearts with food and gladness.” 

-Acts 14:15-17

The only part of the Law a gentile was required to observe were laws for gentiles living among Israel. That is, any application of the Law to a gentile could only be in his relation or proximity to a Jew. In Acts 14 Paul takes his gentile listeners, not to the Law, but to Creation. 

If Paul is witnessing via Creation after the cross, God is still witnessing to Gentiles via Creation in the Acts Age and in the Acts Age epistles. God didn't stop witnessing the through his Creation when he chose Abraham. He didn't stop when Paul was in Athens. He has never stopped witnessing through his creation. Nothing in the revelation of the Mystery in Ephesians changes that in the current dispensation.

After Moses, the problem for the Gentile nations is not that they did not have the Law (the Law only made Israel more guilty), it is that they rejected the witness they did have: Creation and Conscience. Since the Garden, Paul teaches that "in Adam all die" (1 Cor 15). There was no Jew or Gentile until the Lord called Abraham (in uncircumcision, Romans 4:6-10) which did not happen until some 2000 years after the fall in the Garden. Prophets like Noah in uncircumcision without the Law of Moses was called. Abraham was called in uncircumcision as was Moses. And until Moses at Sinai, there was no Law and no chosen earthly national priesthood or children of an earthly Kingdom. Adam, Abel, and Noah would have no idea what any of that calling was. 

From Adam, God’s revelation, to all people, was found in the witness of creation and in the witness of the conscience. Cain knew he had sinned when he killed Abel, for example. Dr. E.W. Bullinger is often criticized for his great work The Witness in the Stars, but scripture is clear that God clearly has a witness in his creation.

Let’s look at the indictment of the nations given in Romans 1. Remember, the Gentiles, like Israel, were indicted, plural, for turning to idols, but turning to idols from what?

The wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress (Greek: katecho) the truth through unrighteousness 

[The only truth they could suppress is the witness God gave them in his creation]

-Romans 1:18 

Because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him or give thanks to Him as God, but became futile in their imaginations, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 

[They could only know him through the witness of creation]

-Romans 1:21 

They turned the truth of God into [the] lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

-Romans 1:25 

 

And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not proper. [acknowledge him as Creator]

-Romans 1:28

Let us quickly let’s turn to Hebrews 3:1-2

What advantage then does the Jew have? Or what profit is there in circumcision? Much in every way! Chiefly because the oracles of God were entrusted to them [plural].

Yet God is never without a witness to the Gentile. God has always sought the reconciliation of every person, despite the plan in view and despite the dispensation. God is the God of reconciliation.

No More Jew or Gentile AND No More Male or Female?

For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek... And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

-Galatians 3:27-29 (edited) KJV

This passage is often trotted out to tray and make two related arguments.

1. The middle wall of partition between Jew and Gentile noted in Ephesians 2:14 was removed at Pentecost
2. All believers of all ages (including the current age) are Abraham's seed

The first should be readily rejected when on simply reads the entire 28th verse.

There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

I don't know anyone who we would consider a Bible-believing Evangelical believer who would hold to the idea either Pentecost or even the removal of the middle partition means we no longer should make distinctions between men and women.

While the privilege of being “one in Christ Jesus” in this context is enjoyed by all to whom Galatians was written, to both Jew and Greek, and to both man and woman, the Law was still very much a present distinction among believers.

Matthew Henry addresses the question of "neither male nor female." as we look at that part of the passage.

That this privilege of being the children of God, and of being by baptism devoted to Christ, is now enjoyed in common by all real Christians. The law indeed made a difference between Jew and Greek, giving the Jews on many accounts the pre-eminence: that also made a difference between bond and free, master and servant, and between male and female, the males being circumcised. But it is not so now; they all stand on the same level, and are all one in Christ Jesus; as the one is not accepted on the account of any national or personal advantages he may enjoy above the other, so neither is the other rejected for the want of them; but all who sincerely believe on Christ, of what nation, or sex, or condition, soever they be, are accepted of him, and become the children of God through faith in him.

-Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary on the Bible 

Matthew Henry makes the case in his commentary that the reference to the difference between male and female is a reference solely to circumcision. Whereas I would agree that has an application, the problem he has is that Paul was still teaching circumcision for the Jews as late as Acts 21.

This is the greater point, that elements of the Law still applied in the Acts Age, but it was no longer a hindrance to Gentiles receiving the blessings of the promises to Abraham and to Israel, after the grafting in. Galatians are arguing on the grounds of the blessings of justification in the earthly plan. This idea cannot be a universal statement about all believers of all ages.

To our second point above we extend the argument, do we believe Adam, Abel, and Noah are "Abrahams's seed?"  

In John chapter 8:31-33 the Lord is addressing unbelieving Jews who are seeking to kill him. In his response he affirms that even though they are trying to kill him, they are "Abraham's seed." So let's break this passage down.

Then Jesus said to those Jews who believed Him, “If you remain in My word, then you are truly My disciples. You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.” They answered Him, “We are Abraham’s seed and have never been in bondage to anyone. Why do You say, ‘You shall be set free’?”

Remember, the Lord's earthly ministry as King was to Israel alone (Matthew 15:24) and his disciples were sent to Israel alone (Matthew 10:5-7). The Son of David came unto his own and the King was rejected (John 1:11). The Kingdom he offered was then again offered to "Ye Men of Israel" in Acts 3. We make careful note here that Acts 3 follows Acts 2 (Pentecost). That offer came by the lips of Peter, an Apostle to the Circumcision. Unironically, we turn back to Galatians chapter 2 and note this distinction.

On the contrary, they saw that I was entrusted with the gospel to the uncircumcised, as the gospel to the circumcised was to Peter. For He who worked effectively in Peter for the apostleship to the circumcised worked effectively in me toward the Gentiles.

-Galatians 2:7-8

But let's continue in John 8, starting with verse 34.

 

Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly I say to you, whoever commits sin is a slave of sin. Now a slave does not remain in the house forever, but a son remains forever. Therefore if the Son sets you free, you shall be free indeed. I know that you are Abraham’s seed. But you seek to kill Me, because My word has no place in you. I am telling what I have seen with My Father, and you are doing what you have seen with your father.”

No Gentile, believer or not, would be called “Abraham's seed” by the Lord and no gentile would be called a "son of the Kingdom" by the Lord, but unbelieving Jews are called both by the Lord. Here in John 8 he acknowledges the position of the Jew as “Abraham’s seed” and in Matthew 8 the Lord states, juxtaposing the faith of gentile dog (the centurion there), that the "sons of the kingdom will be cast into outer darkness." 

“Truly I say to you, I have not found such great faith, no, not in Israel. And I say to you that many will come from the east and west [Gnetiles] and will dine with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven. But the sons of the kingdom [some Israelites] will be thrown out into outer darkness. There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”

-Matthew 8:10-12

The plan of blessing and redemption was always available to the Gentile. Abraham himself was a Gentile when justified. The blessings for the Gentile are not just part of the Mystery of Ephesians.

Does this blessedness [the forgiveness of sin by faith] then come upon the circumcised only, or upon the uncircumcised also? We are saying that faith was credited to Abraham as righteousness. How then was it credited? When he was in circumcision? Or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision. And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith that he had while being uncircumcised, so that he might be the father of all those who believe, though they are uncircumcised, that righteousness might be credited to them also...

-Romans 4:9-11

A Gentile, in faith, always had Abraham as his father. And while this is true, he still could not claim the earthly or kingdom blessings promised to Israelites, the physical seed of Abraham.

Romans 15 also lays out the argument from the Hebrew scriptures that the gift of Life (resurrection) was always intended for Gentiles. Adam was in uncircumcision. Abel was in uncircumcision. Noah was in uncircumcision. And Abraham was in uncircumcision when their faith was rewarded. 

In the context of the gift of life beyond the grave, all who have faith, whether under the law or not, whether circumcised or not, whether bond nor free, whether Jew of Gentile, whether man or woman, ALL had the same free gift of justification. And during all those ages and blessings, the plan for the earth was the only hope in view. Galatians does not change any of that.

But we would never conclude from that that all, in every age, have Abraham as a father in the flesh. We could not apply that Adam or Noah. The Lord does not apply the physical relationship to the Roman Centurion or to the Canaanite woman in his earthly ministry. As the Son of David, as the coming King in the line of David, the Lord says he was "sent to none but to the lost sheep of the House of Israel."  That is a physical, racial distinction.

Paul is addressing the gift of justification in Galatians. Now, what is also there is the grafting in of Gentiles. That is a difference from the gospel age. Were Gentiles grafted into "justification?" No. As we have seen, Gentiles since the beginning have believed. The gift of justification has always been available to Gentiles. Jonah did not preach the Law to Nineveh (as the Law was never given to Gentiles), but he did offer them forgiveness  by faith.

Paul, in very plain terms, tells us the grafting in (which started with Cornelius in Acts 10, who was already a believer) was for the expressed purpose of making a very real Israel "jealous" (Romans 10:19; 11:11). God was not trying to make some nation that ended at Pentecost jealous. He certainly was not trying to make some "Gentile Israel Church" jealous. As we also see in Romans 11:18, the Lord warns Gentile believers (still making a distinction) not to become "arrogant" against the Jewish branches and root (Israel) lest they (Gentile believers) be "cut off." Cut off from what? A free gift of justification? No, cut off from the kingdom blessings of Israel.

For I am speaking to you Gentiles. Inasmuch as I am the apostle to the Gentiles [we pause to note that this office is no longer needed nor recognized Post Acts, but it is here in Romans and in Galatians], I magnify my ministry, if somehow I may make my kinsmen [Jews] jealous and may save some of them. For if their rejection means the reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance mean but life from the dead? If the first portion of the dough is holy, the batch is also holy. And if the root is holy, so are the branches. But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, being a wild olive shoot, were grafted in among them and became a partaker with them of the root and richness of the olive tree, do not boast against the branches. If you boast, remember you do not sustain the root, but the root sustains you. You will say then, “The branches were broken off, so that I might be grafted in.” This is correct. They were broken off because of unbelief, but you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but fear. For if God did not spare the natural branches, neither will He spare you. Therefore consider the goodness and severity of God—severity toward those who fell, but goodness toward you, if you continue in His goodness. Otherwise, you [Gentile believers] also will be cut off. 

-Romans 11:13-22

We ask again in this day, cut off from what? If this is the company of believers today with no more Jew or Gentile in any sense, what is the application of this warning today?

We have to see the context of God's dealings. With Adam, for example, the Lord was not dealing the promise of land or a Kingdom. The Lord was not telling Noah that he would be given a land from the Euphrates to the Nile. Noah was not told of a throne or a temple. And for those who had that hope, they still "looked for a city whose builder and maker is God," (Heb 11:10) that is, "the New Jerusalem which comes down from heaven"(Rev 21:2) to the earth. 

Now let us look back to where we started in Galatians 3:27.

For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.

Could this company of believers have been baptized into the same body as the believers who entered by faith into Paul's revelation in Ephesians 3? No.  The identification (baptism) of the believers in Galatia in that age would be part of the a body known and revealed as Paul witnessed in Acts 26:22. Paul testified there that he taught nothing that was not known by Moses and the Prophets.

For by one spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one spirit.

-1 Cor 12:13

The aforementioned Romans 15 quotes from the Law, the Psalms, and the Prophet Isaiah. Paul was explaining there a mystery, but a mystery that has been revealed, jut not understood. Paul explains:

Now I say that Jesus Christ has become a servant to the circumcised on behalf of the truth of God, to confirm the promises made to the patriarchs, and that the Gentiles might glorify God for His mercy... 

-Romans 15:8-9a

Note the distinction in that age. The promises were made to Israel's fathers (not to Gentiles). Paul had affirmed in Romans 9 that the promises and covenants pertain to Israel (not some Israel-Gentile-Church). There was very much an Israel still in God's plan at the time of the writing of Romans.

They are Israelites, and to them belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; to them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ. God who is over all be blessed for ever. Amen. 

-Romans 9:4-5

Now to him who is able to strengthen you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery which was kept secret for long ages but is now disclosed and through the prophetic writings is made known to all nations [Gentiles], according to the command of the eternal God, to bring about the obedience of faith— to the only wise God be glory for evermore through Jesus Christ! Amen.

-Romans 16:25-27 (the end of the book)

God was still calling out to a real Israel (see our study on Acts 3 in The Gentile Twelve Tribe Heresy). Gid was working his earthly plan. That is the reasoning for the grafting of Gentiles into the blessings of Israel. That is the reason Gentile believers were put under the Law in regard to the "necessary things" quoted from Leviticus in Acts 15 and Acts 21. 

Back in Galatians we are still under the earthly plan and the plan for Israel. Entrance into the Kingdom blessings for any Israelite (Jew) of any age was faithfulness. This is clearly expressed in the parables. But we note again that even the unfaithful are called "sons of the kingdom," "children," "masters," and "servants" by the Lord in the gospel while even faithful Gentiles are called "little dogs" until the grafting in.

With this context in mind, our passage in Galatians becomes clearer. In Christ, in justification, there is no Law to impose differences between Jew or Greek, Master or Servant, Man or Woman. Justification does not vary. And in the Acts age, with Gentiles being grafted in, while the difference was still recognized under the Law in terms of order, there was no difference in terms of justification or blessing. In the gospel age and prior, a Gentile might have life by faith, but he had no access to promises of the Kingdom.

As we know, the final revelation to Paul, revealed in Ephesians, and in the Post Acts epistles, eliminates any differences between Jew and Gentile, temporarily sets Israel aside, and the hope is no longer a restored kingdom in Israel on earth, but a hope in the far above the heavens. The entire setting changes. Galatians and Ephesians are acted out in two different stages in two different cities.

 

Let us go back and finish the exchange in John 8 and note what I skipped over. The Lord had affirmed that the unbelieving Jews he was addressing were part of the children of Abraham, (“I know that you are Abraham’s seed”), but the condition of faith and faithfulness was still part of the covenant God has with that earthly people.

 

They answered Him, “Abraham is our father. Jesus said to them, “If you were Abraham’s children, you would do the works of Abraham. But now you seek to kill Me, a Man who has told you the truth which I heard from God. Abraham did not do this. You are doing the works of your father.” 

-John 8:39-41

 

This speaks to the "two seeds" principle which goes back to the very beginning of the ages ("I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed" Gen 3:15). We see the two seeds in the parables. Abel was of God, Cain was "of the wicked one" (1 John 3:12). This distinction does not change by one's race. The wicked ones of Israel who rejected the Lord and questioned even the story of his birth were nevertheless "Abraham's seed" in the flesh and could still obtain the promises if they would come to the Lord by faith in that age. This could never be said of a Gentile before the grafting in. The promises are for Israel (Romans 9).

Do you we the distinction? The Gentiles referenced in Galatians were indeed fully children of Abraham by faith, but that was only possible because of the grafting in. The purpose of which was to make Israel jealous (and it made believing Jews jealous as well). As we have seen, there is no distinction in justification between Jew and Gentile (and there never was), but in the Acts Age Paul was explaining that because of the grafting in of Gentiles into Israel which started in Acts 10, there was now no distinction in the kingdom blessings.

But that condition did not apply in the gospel age (the age of the Law) and it does not apply in the current age of  the revelation of Paul in Ephesians which concerns, not earthly blessings, but blessing in the far above the heavens.

Some summary context for any who might be new to Right Division:

The Apostles made clear distinctions between Jewish and Gentile believers in practice (notably in Acts 15 and 21) and among believing Jews and unbelieving Jews (would we preach Peter's message in Acts 3 today?) in their ministries, but never in terms of Resurrection Life which, from Adam, has always been a gift by grace through faith.

 
The middle wall between Jew and Greek (Gentile) did not come down until after the Book of Acts and that truth was revealed to Paul alone. Paul witnessed that he was in chains for the hope of Israel (very much at the center of God's plan) as late as Acts 28 and he stated that was imprisoned for Gentiles post-Acts in Ephesians.

Paul testified that he taught nothing that was not taught by Moses and the Prophets in Acts 26. While the blessings in the land and the Kingdom were made known to the sons of men, the revelation of the "one new man" of Ephesians was kept hidden from before the ages; unknown to the Prophets. The apostles anticipated the Kingdom in a restored Israel in the Acts (as the risen Lord taught the Apostles to the circumcision in Acts 1 who will sit on 12 thrones judging the 12 tribes in a restored Israel one day). Paul taught blessings in the far above the heavens, unsearchable riches, as the hope for in the current age.

Not essential for fellowship, but rightly dividing these distinctions will bring the different hopes and plans of God into clearer view (as best we can in these failing bodies and minds). Rightly dividing the hopes must be applied when reading the lack of distinctions laid out in Galatians. 

Thank you for your time and attention this evening. Let’s finish with a quick prayer:

Lord, thank you for the faithfulness of our apostle, Paul. We are limited creatures, and we constantly need your help as we seek to righty divide your word of truth. Bless each one here and all the families represented. We ask these things in the name of great God and Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

The Theological Rot Caused by Heaven/Hell and Saved/Lost Thinking

But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment. And whoever says to his brother, ‘Raca,’ shall be in danger of the Sanhedrin. But whoever says, ‘You fool,’ shall be in danger of hell fire.

-Matthew 5:22

When one fails to recognize that God had plans for different spheres of blessings and tries to interpret every passage through the prism of either being "saved or lost" or as speaking of "heaven or hell," he misses almost all the Bible is seeking to teach. This is because the vast majority of scripture is dealing with God's plans for the restoration of Paradise, the restoration of the earth (and related heavens), and the restoration of the Davidic throne and the Kingdom in Israel.

The Lord came to the people of Israel alone to announce that gospel of the Kingdom.  

Jesus went throughout all the cities and villages, teaching in their [Israel's] synagogues, preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing every sickness and every disease among the people [Jews].

-Matthew 9:35

These twelve Jesus sent out, and commanded them, saying, “Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter any city of the Samaritans. But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. As you go, preach, saying, ‘The kingdom of heaven is at hand.’ Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, and cast out demons. Freely you have received, freely give.

-Matthew 10:5-8


But He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”

-Matthew 15:24

This calling to Israel alone continued into the Acts Age after the risen Lord taught the enlightened Apostles (who are promised to one day sit on twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel, Matt 19:28; Luke 22:29-30) about the restoration of the Kingdom in Israel (Acts 1:3-8). Even after the Lord grafted in Gentiles to the blessings of Israel in Acts 10 (not unto Life, as that was always available to Gentiles by faith) for the sake of making Israel (still around in the Acts age) jealous (Rom 10:19; Rom 11:11-14). We have covered that elsewhere yet refer to it here to help with context.

As the Lord gives his well-known and oft-quoted "Sermon on the Mount" (Matthew chapters 5-7), he makes a statement regarding "hell." Although the verse may be quoted often, I don't see too many preachers applying it as stated. It seems to contradict the gospel of the free grace of God. Well, it certainly does if one rips it from its context, applies the Greek mythical understanding of the afterlife to it, and ignores the plan for the earth as laid out in the prophecy of Isaiah. 

We have covered the interpretation of Matthew 5:22 previously and point the reader HERE if he is interested in that study. Today, we want to look at how some of the luminaries of evangelical history missed this passage because of their insistence on seeing every verse as dealing with personal redemption and as an instruction for attaining heaven.

The Jewish teachers had taught, that nothing except actual murder was forbidden by the sixth commandment. Thus they explained away its spiritual meaning. Christ showed the full meaning of this commandment; according to which we must be judged hereafter, and therefore ought to be ruled now... We ought carefully to preserve Christian love and peace with all our brethren; and if at any time there is a quarrel, we should confess our fault, humble ourselves to our brother, making or offering satisfaction for wrong done in word or deed: and we should do this quickly; because, till this is done, we are unfit for communion with God in holy ordinances. And when we are preparing for any religious exercises, it is good for us to make that an occasion of serious reflection and self-examination. What is here said is very applicable to our being reconciled to God through Christ. While we are alive, we are in the way to his judgement-seat; after death, it will be too late. When we consider the importance of the case, and the uncertainty of life, how needful it is to seek peace with God, without delay!

-Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary on the Bible

I hate to use this word, but this explanation is utter nonsense in light of the context of the passage. How can one recognize that the Lord is referencing statements made to "our brethren" in a "Christian" context and then not even address the reference to "hell fire?" Let alone Henry's complete omission of the reference to the Sanhedrin. If the one "sin" leads to a reckoning before some sort of supposed Christian Sanhedrin here, why would the other be some post-death judgment? And again we ask why he fails to explain the use of "hell"? 

How is the reader looking for the true meaning of these warnings supposed to understand Henry here? The result of the sin of being in a quarrel with a brother is being unfit for communion and then facing that sin at the Judgment Seat? This gives no explanation of the warning of "hell fire." It opens up the reader to the false doctrines of sacramentalists and other works-oriented salvation systems. 

The reference to supposed "Christian ordinances" like "communion" is dragged out of the next verse in the passage and assumed to be the equivalent of the "altar." The following is the New American Bible (Revised) translation which transliterates the Greek words "Sanhedrin" and "Gehenna" in the English. 

 

You have heard that it was said to your ancestors, ‘You shall not kill; and whoever kills will be liable to judgment.’ But I say to you, whoever is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment, and whoever says to his brother, ‘Raqa,’ will be answerable to the Sanhedrin, and whoever says, ‘You fool,’ will be liable to fiery Gehenna. Therefore, if you bring your gift to the altar, and there recall that your brother has anything against you, leave your gift there at the altar, go first and be reconciled with your brother, and then come and offer your gift. 

 

Matthew Henry isolates these warnings and tried to drag them into a "church" of his own making. To do so he has to ignore the context of the Lord's earthly ministry and all the earthly promises to Israel and to the David. This does violence to the text. 

If he wanted to try and find some application for us today, perhaps he could do that. But to interpret the passage as for today while ignoring the obvious reference to the Valley of Hinnom in Israel's history and in her prophets is unforgivable and has led many astray. Such thinking may lead to a denial of the finished work of Christ.

In his opening commentary on the Beatitudes in Matthew 5, Henry immediately drags in a Gentile church unknown to the context and nowhere in sight in the Lord's earthly ministry. This confusion, denying the Lord's own words in the book, has caused not only a simple confusion among God's people today, but a confusion that brings into doubt the victory won in the Lord's resurrection.

 

Our Savior here gives eight characters of blessed people, which represent to us the principal graces of a Christian.

-Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary on the Bible

Matthew Henry mirrors much of Calvinistic thought on the passage. I shouldn't be so hard on him. At least he tried to address it. Many commentaries basically skip over it. Now let us turn to John Wesley and Arminian thought to illustrate that this error is not unique to Matthew Henry or to Calvinism.

Hell fire — In the valley of Hinnom (whence the word in the original is taken) the children were used to be burnt alive to Moloch. It was afterward made a receptacle for the filth of the city, where continual fires were kept to consume it. And it is probable, if any criminals were burnt alive, it was in this accursed and horrible place. Therefore both as to its former and latter state, it was a fit emblem of hell. It must here signify a degree of future punishment, as much more dreadful than those incurred in the two former cases, as burning alive is more dreadful than either strangling or stoning. [emphasis mine]

-John Wesley's Explanatory Notes on the Bible

Wesley makes no attempt to explain the warning in regard to Gehenna fire. He imposes on the text a metaphor for the common understanding of the Greek mythical "hell" yet without cause. He assumes a fiery place where bodiless "souls" are tortured by God. But worse than that, he assumes (since the passage is a warning to "brothers") that this warning is relevant to those in Christ in this age.  

This is where the Reformation went off the rails very early on. William Tyndale recognized the error in believing in bodiless souls (either in man's heaven or in his hell). It was and is a diminishing of the resurrection (Christ's and ours). This idea of bodiless souls inflicted on Christ's ministry to Israel in the context of the covenants and promises to her (Romans 9) has done great harm to believers over the centuries. So much so that we have become dependent on a priest-class to explain these seemingly contradictory ideas to us. 2 Tim 2:15 is dead. 

Study to show yourself approved by God, a workman who need not be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

-2 Timothy 2:15

I would also note here that in the next two verses in the passages concerning taking a gift to the altar, Wesley is silent. The reader (if he has surrendered his study to the commentator) is left with no context for taking a gift to the altar. But perhaps that's better than those who have tried to equate it with the Lord's Supper or some other supposed "Christian" ordinance. In any case, the Body or the current calling has no ordinances. The ordinances of Israel stood between the Jew and Gentile both under the Law and after the grafting in the Acts age and Acts age epistles.

For He is our peace, who has made both groups [Jews and Gentiles] one and has broken down the barrier of the dividing wall, by abolishing in His flesh the enmity, that is, the law of the commandments contained in ordinances, that in Himself He might make the two into one new man, thus making peace, and that He might reconcile both to God into one body through the cross, thereby slaying the enmity.

-Ephesians 2:14-16 (written Post Acts)

And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He has resurrected together with Him, having forgiven you all sins. He blotted out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us and contrary to us, and He took it out of the way, nailing it to the cross.

-Colossians 2:13-14

Finally, I turn to A.C. Gaebelein, a traditional, Acts 2 dispensationalist. While he gets closer to the correct interpretation, in my opinion, he still tries to apply today (although without doing as much violence to the current calling or to the gospel of grace.

“Whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca (a word embodying hatred and contempt) shall be called before the Sanhedrin; but whosoever shall say, Fool, shall be subject to the penalty of the hell fire.” It will be so, no doubt, when the kingdom will be come into the earth; swift judgment will overtake the offender. But the words lay bare the heart and show the impossibility of man to stand before God, who judges the heart, in their own righteousness. The believer being the partaker of the divine nature, is righteous and loves his brother. Only the reception of eternal life, which is Christ Himself, can produce righteousness and love. “Whosoever has been begotten of God does not practice sin, because His seed abides in him and he cannot sin, because he has been begotten of God. In this are manifest the children of God and the children of the devil. Whoever does not practice righteousness is not of God, and he who does not love his brother” (1 John 3:9-11). The believer walking in the Spirit will in no way fulfill flesh’s lust. [emphasis mine]

- Gaebelein's Annotated Bible 

 

Here Gaebelein rightly points us to the conditions in the future earthly kingdom in Israel. But he fails to sufficiently distinguish it from the gospel of grace. As we have seen repeatedly, Believers are capable of all sorts of wickedness, sins damnable under the Law. 

We must be very clear to distinguish between interpretation and any possible application to our lives today. All scripture is profitable, but in many cases the profitability is seeing the nature, omnipotence, omniscience, and workings of God, not in trying to fit ourselves into a passage. 

Are People Dropping Dead in Your "Acts" Church?

In short, the Covenants are for Israel (Ex 19, Jer 31, Rom 9, the New Covenant yet still future and the Old still passing away in that age, Heb 8:13) and the plan for the kingdom and the land were what the Apostles were anticipating (and promising) if Israel repented (Acts 1 , Acts 3). Try preaching that today. 

Gentile believers in the Acts Age (after being grafted into the blessings of Israel to make unbelieving Israel jealous, Rom 10, Rom 11) were put under the Levitical law for Gentiles living among Israel (Lev 17, Acts 15, Acts 21). Under the Law, a Gentile could live peaceably among Israel, but could not participate in the Feasts unless a proselyte (circumcised). So, the Law has instructions for Israel and for Gentiles living among Israel. It is no guide for today in that way.

In the Acts Age, believing Jews were still circumcising their boys and Paul was obeying the Law (Acts 21). So, the quick death of Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5) is in keeping with that economy and not our current economy. We do not see people dropping dead from lying to the Holy Spirit or holding back pledged money to a "church."

In that Age, Paul was still keeping part of the non-sacrificial Law and he was accused of not following the Law.

“You see, brother, how many myriads of Jews there are who have believed, and they are all zealous for the law; but they have been informed about you that you teach all the Jews who are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children nor to walk according to the customs. 

-Acts 21:20-21  

But Paul certainly was keeping the Law. He was upset that anyone thought differently. The accusations were "nothing" (false), he pleads. And he was clear to tell Gentiles that they did not have to keep the Law, just the "necessary things" gleaned from Leviticus as noted.

Take them and be purified with them, and pay their expenses so that they may shave their heads, and that all may know that those things of which they were informed concerning you are nothing, but that you yourself also walk orderly and keep the law. But concerning the Gentiles who believe, we have written and decided that they should observe no such thing, except that they should keep themselves from things offered to idols, from blood, from things strangled, and from sexual immorality.”

 -Acts 21:24-25

One law shall be for the native-born and for the stranger who dwells among you. 

-Ex 12:49

When they asked him to stay a longer time with them, he did not consent, but took leave of them, saying, “I must by all means keep this coming feast in Jerusalem; but I will return again to you, God willing.” And he sailed from Ephesus. 

-Acts 18

But neither the twelve nor Paul required Gentile believers to keep any feasts. just the "necessary things" in Acts 15 and 21 gleaned from the Law for Gentiles. The Lord's Supper was the Passover (the Lord said so) and those who took it unworthily got sick or died. Is that happening today? I don't think so. And in the Law, Gentiles could not partake unless circumcised (Ex 12:48). 

As we see in the Book of Hebrews, the Law (apart from the sacrificial Law) and the Old Covenant were still recognized by the churches of the Acts age (Heb 8, Heb 10). When Paul is given his revelation (unknown to the sons of men before that, Eph 3), the middle wall between Jew and Gentile came down and the law seen in the ordinances which separated Jew from Gentile was done away (Eph 2).  

When we understand these conditions, the swift punishment of Acts 5 (even before the grafting in of Gentiles into Israel's blessings), with the hope of the restored kingdom in view (Acts 1), and the future rulers ready to take their places on the twelve thrones (Matt 19), while facing a cleansing and winnowing coming for Israel, and the reward of the New Jerusalem and the implementation of the New Covenant (prophets and Rev)... we can see Ananias and Sapphira suffering under those conditions (conditions we do not see today). 

Looking at Acts 5:3, the Geneva Bible makes a rather stunning argument:

 For when they had appointed that farm or possession for the Church, they were foolish to keep away a part of the price, as though they were dealing with men, and not with God, and therefore he says afterwards that they tempted God.

I don't see a lot of people dropping dead these days for not honoring promises to the "Church." When we understand that not everything called a "church" is the same gathering, we can start to see God's different dealings with different called-out groups for different purposes.

Pentecost was anticipating the Millennium and the conditions of that age to come, but it was not the start of that age. And the plan in sight was the earthly plan for the nation of Israel in the land of promise under the restored Kingdom (Acts 1, Rom 9, etc.).

`He that worketh deceit shall not dwell within My house: he that telleth lies shall not tarry in My sight. I will early (morning by morning or every day) destroy all the wicked of the land; that I may cut off all wicked doers from the city of the LORD'. 

-Psalm 101:7-8

The Lord warned at His return in Luke 21 that after Israel's time of testing and cleansing, the wicked will we dealt with swiftly. But Israel mist go through that winnowing period before a Virgin Israel (New Covenant, Jeremiah 31) can realize the fullness of God's plan.

“And there will be signs in the sun, in the moon, and in the stars; and on the earth distress of nations, with perplexity, the sea and the waves roaring; men’s hearts failing them from fear and the expectation of those things which are coming on the earth, for the powers of the heavens will be shaken. Then they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. 

-Luke 21:26-27 

There will be direct judgment for sin each day in the Millennium so that God's kingdom standards can be maintained. In this age of grace such judgment is suspended. If this were not so, the undertakers would have a real problem. The death judgment of Ananias and Sapphira is not the only judgment in the Acts. Later on is recorded the judgment of blindness that fell upon Elymas [Acts 13 by Paul].

-Stuart Allen on the Acts Age and Afterwards (excerpt)

For he who eats and drinks unworthily, eats and drinks damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body. For this reason many are weak and unhealthy among you, and many die.

-1 Corinthians 11:29-30

So, some in the Acts age dropped dead for taking the Lord's supper "unworthily" and some dropped dead for lying to the Holy Spirit and holding back. All believers in that age either obeyed the non-sacrificial Law (Jews) or the Law for Gentiles living among Israel (the "necessary things"). None of those conditions exist in this current present age. No one is dropping dead (or getting sick) for taking the Lord's Supper unworthily, and no one is dropping dead for not keeping a pledge to the church.